<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Baba Sucks - Latest Comments in For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://babasucks.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:01:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/118/for-love-of-irc/#comment-1628723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Re: goliamokuche   No, that statement did not say that we had a fix for the inherent issue of copiability.  Rather, you have to take a two-pronged approach to this sort of thing:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Discourage:  You can, with varying degrees of success, do things to discourage people from copying things -- this is essentially what the no-copy flag is.  It makes it harder to copy things that shouldn't be.   Not harder, but more difficult.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reaction:  You can react to IP theft through systems that are already in place -- abuse reports, DMCA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;   I think that the concern with CopyBot is that it makes that first part less effective, and I think that people fear that it will happen unbeknownst to them, preventing from reaction.    That statement meant to convey that we may be able to help with detection -- which makes reaction easier.  There are no magic fixes, merely best efforts on the part of everyone involved.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bushing</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 04:01:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/118/for-love-of-irc/#comment-1628722</link><description>&amp;nbsp;OMG YOU GUYS REALLY DO SUCK!!! HERES A THOUGHT GO DESTROY TSOL!! ITS ALREADY TRASHED! YOU COULD PROBABLY HELP IT ALONG TO THE DUNG PILE !! OH WAIT LIBSL IS A DUNG PILE!! HOPE ALL YOUR HARD DRIVES CRASH AND BURN !!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Some one</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:43:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/118/for-love-of-irc/#comment-1628721</link><description>I guess, there is a ton of irony here.&amp;nbsp; And, I don&amp;#39;t get it. I have the feeling that the libsl project members are now trying to tell us that this is fixable. &amp;quot;libsecondlife member John Hurliman&lt;a href="http://www.libsecondlife.org/content/view/31/" rel="nofollow"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.libsecondlife.org/content/view/31/" rel="nofollow"&gt;said in a statement&lt;/a&gt; on the group&amp;rsquo;s blog. &amp;ldquo;We, the libsecondlife developers, recognize that we must be more vigilant about controlling our creations &amp;mdash; we are deeply sorry for any part in the damage which may have been caused.&amp;rdquo;  In my understanding, anything that can be rendered, can be copied too. So, the residents and media have to get used to this situation - anyone can copy (just like ctrl-c, ctrl-v in the browser), or just like anyone can copy and produce duplicate clothes in RL. The problem is purely social and philosophical, according to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goliamokuche</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:32:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/118/for-love-of-irc/#comment-1628720</link><description>IRC has always been the definitive place for the authentic, true, and genuine voice of the masses.   -- God dammit Baba, the little comment editor has the buttons to format bold, italic and underline, but not sarcasm.   People are gonna think I think that! AUUUUGGGH.   I will not bring up arguing on the internet. I will not bring up arguing on the internet. I will not bring up arguing on the internet. I will not bring up----   Fuck it, kill a kitten already. I&amp;#39;m spent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Rice</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:14:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/118/for-love-of-irc/#comment-1628719</link><description>Since I'm not english mother tongue, I may be wrong about this, but it looks like this transcript is full of irony. &lt;br&gt;Could someone patiently explain me if I'm wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Signore Iredell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:49:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: For Love of IRC | Baba Sucks</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/118/for-love-of-irc/#comment-1628718</link><description>Well... I guess that&amp;#39;s a unique way to do PR. I dunno, I&amp;#39;m all for LibSL and everything, but I often wonder if the arrogance some (not all) members of the group display is really the best way to handle things.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Talon Lardner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>