<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Baba Sucks - Latest Comments in No Beans In Chili</title><link>http://babasucks.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:44:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No Beans In Chili</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/20/no-beans-in-chili/#comment-1628537</link><description>You are correct Chance! I think I will use that line in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">babasucks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:44:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Beans In Chili</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/20/no-beans-in-chili/#comment-1628536</link><description>Wait. You said "chili." By definition that means no beans. When someone serves me something they call "chili," if it has beans I politely correct them. "Oh, this is a very nice bean stew, but chili? Surely you jest."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chance Takashi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:17:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Beans In Chili</title><link>http://www.babasucks.com/2006/20/no-beans-in-chili/#comment-1628535</link><description>Fantastique to see you blogging more, Baba! I agree with you wholly on this matter: I like a good, meaty chili... but NO BEANS!!! Ew.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Torley Linden</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>